Introduction  
In Concert
On Television
The End of The Rainbow
Ask Steve Sanders
Web Site Updates
Hot Judy News
Image Archive
View Slide Show
Judy Wallpapers
Guestbook
Contributors
Finding 'Rare' Judy
On Cable This Month
Contact Information
Other Websites
Rainbow Review


Coyne Steven Sanders is the author of the book, Rainbow's End: The Judy Garland Show [ISBN 0-688-09088-5], published in hardcover in 1990 by William Morrow & Co. In 1992 his book was released by Zebra Books in paperback [ISBN 0-8217-3708-2] and is still widely available in this format. The hardcover can still be found as a special order, i.e. some internet book stores which find copies of the hardcover from various sources, such as Amazon Books.

Judy Garland was at the pinnacle of her career when she signed with CBS to star in a multi-million dollar weekly television series. The Judy Garland Show immediately became the most exciting -- and explosive -- event of the 1963-64 television season, unleashing a storm of controversy that has not ceased in over thirty years. 

The Judy Garland Show seemed sabotaged from the very beginning and became a single-season casualty. CBS plunged the program into chaos -- tampering with its format, hiring and firing staff members and refusing to move the series away from NBC's Bonanza, then the highest-rated show on the air. At the same time, Garland was locked in a high-stakes power struggle among network executives, staff members, an estranged husband and her managers, Freddie Fields and a pre-Indecent Exposure David Begelman. 

Lavishly illustrated with dozens of rare, previously unpublished photographs, Rainbow's End -- written by a former television news journalist -- draws upon candid interviews with nearly 100 key people involved in the day-to-day production of the Garland series. Rainbow's End is the extraordinary on-camera and behind-the-scenes saga of the singer's last dazzling moment at the top that was The Judy Garland Show -- a so-called television "failure" that in recent years has been "rediscovered" and lauded with tremendous critical and popular acclaim. 

Many years in the making, Steve's in-depth investigation, research and original interviews with nearly 100 people closely associated with The Judy Garland Show have finally put to rest many of the misconceptions, half-truths and (often self-serving) lies which for years unfairly tarnished both star and program. In direct contrast to Mel Torme's earlier memoir about the Garland series, Sanders' critically acclaimed book presents Judy not as impossible, temperamental and woefully undisciplined, but instead reveals a vastly different Garland -- one very aware, sharp, funny, compassionate and always working to make her series a success.

Publisher's Weekly called Rainbow's End a "sensitive yet straightforward treatment." Liza Minnelli: "The only book I've read about my mother -- and the only one worth reading." Lorna Luft has said, "I love the book because Steve is one of the few who understood my mother's problems -- and her genius." And, offered columnist Liz Smith, "This book stands, in many ways, as Judy's final testament...Here is a work that celebrates Garland's talent and her professionalism...a meticulous, behind-the-scenes look..." And, to Steve, the highest compliment perhaps came from Lorna, who confided, "You've captured my mother completely in this book. She's alive on these pages." 



It's been twelve years since the original hardcover release and people still to this day ask questions -- and share some definite opinions! -- about the book, the Garland series, and Judy's work and personal life in reference to the series and in response to issues raised in my book. 

Since my book's release in paperback in 1992, Mel Torme has re-released his book with a new introduction, rather defensively mentioning Rainbow's End (though not by name) in trying to defend his book, which is riddled with chronological errors, self-serving bending of facts and incidents and, above all, his "take" on Judy, which remains largely negative and not only unsympathetic, but untruthful in the telling. I say this because the overwhelming reaction to the nearly 100 people I interviewed for the book squarely came out on Judy's side --although I did not write the book with any agenda. Certainly, I wanted to the book to reflect Judy in a positive manner, but I also approached the task from a journalist's point of view. I was prepared to "go with" whatever the final mix came out to be. It is clear in my research that Mel didn't protect Judy or the series; he was looking out for himself. 

Happily, Judy Garland was (largely) vindicated by my interviews (and research of things written at the time), particularly going against the Torme perspective that Judy didn't care, didn't work, didn't try, or didn't ATTEND. She was, in fact, THERE, in more than just the literal sense of being at CBS Television City. She worked very hard to make the series work, and in the process was in constant battle with the network, certain CBS executives, and her managers, most notably the notorious David Begelman. Her personal problems contributed to the demise of the series, to be sure, but her problems were not THE reason for the failure of the series; they were a small but contributing factor. They were, for the most part, "manageable," the word used by her first executive producer, George Schlatter. 

And what makes the shows even more significant, historically, is that they do present Judy's last sustained effort in her career. More importantly, they capture the last moments of Judy near her zenith and, as I wrote then, in complete control of her resources. And critical response to the shows (even in limited release to date) continues to be overwhelmingly positive; many current-day reviews note they didn't remember Judy "being that good." Well, of course, WE always knew. The rest of the world is now catching up in terms of how (largely) first-rate Judy was on these programs.

So, if I can answer any lingering questions you have from reading the book, please ask. And if you have a thought or an opinion about Judy relating to the shows or other aspects of the book, feel free to share them here as well. A final note: I have only been online for about two months now and when I signed on I was truly overwhelmed, bombarded, really, by the outpouring of reaction and positive response to the book when it became known that I was on the Net. The book was such a personal labor of love to be sure, but after seven years, in some ways I had thought that, while the book might have made a bit of a splash at the time (in revisionist terms of what it had to say about Judy in a positive sense vs. the Torme memoirs), I really had thought Rainbow's End had been forgotten in time; John Fricke's "World's Greatest Entertainer" is probably the best all-around book ever written about her in my mind. 
 
 


Q: You've mentioned (in the JUDY List) the thrill of us having not only one, but SEVERAL "Judys" on the series (5 or 6) ... Could you give us a breakdown of the different ones (and shows she "appeared" on?) ("There's a farm in Pasadena that GROWS Judy Garlands!") Submitted by Scott Schechter


Well, okay. Remember, this is a subjective account! And I'm not sure there are actually six until I run down all 26 episodes during the course of answering this question. (I know nothing gets by this group...) 

The first five episodes are Judy #1. The Schlatter hours: Judy's hair is more relaxed, curled, more subtle makeup, attractively gowned, but (except for #2 Basie) not dazzling in theatricality.(#1 - #2 - #3 - #4 - #5)

Judy #2: Jewison hour #6 (Lawrence); rested from hiatus; looks great. (Unique look to this show only in make up and hair.)

Judy #3: Jewison #7 (O'Connor); Jewison #8 (Maharis) - Jewison #9 (Barbra): 

Judy #4 - Shorter hair style, which she had done while in Manhattan during brief production break -- Jewison #10 (Bolger) - Jewison #11 (Allen) 

Judy #5 - #12 (Damone) and #13 (Peggy Lee) [This is the beginning of the teased "Jackie Kennedy" hairstyles she would maintain for duration of the series.] Particularly in show #12 and somewhat for #13, Judy also looks less rested and more drawn than in previous shows; not coinidentally, this is during the period she had a series of intensive production meetings with CBS president Aubrey in New York about the course and fate of the series; Judy wanted Schlatter back, as Jewison was leaving after show #13. No wonder the turmoil shows, though not in performance. 

Judy #6: Colleran #14 (Darin); #15 (Christmas); #16 (Merman); #17 (Damone); #18 (Raye). Show #14 marks the introduction of the basic hair style she would more or less keep for the remainder of the series; also from show #14 on, her make--up became more pronounced, more theatrical. Judy's performances (particularly #16-#18) were somewhat looser during this cycle.

Judy #7: the concert/semi-concert installments (shows #20 - #21 - #22 - #23 - #24 - #25 - #26).

One more Judy than I thought; this is very important. If we go into another paperback printing, I'll have to demand a correction! I wrote "six" -- what was I thinking!

Q: Can you (at SOME POINT) give us a WEEKLY BREAKDOWN of the NIELSEN Ratings for each airing? (For now, can you give us an OVERVIEW? .... I know the PREMIERE Broadcast of 9-29-63 had the highest rating and BEAT "Bonanza" in the ratings! ... SORRY I had to use the "B" word!!! .... "Bonanza" is a FOUR-LETTER word to me!!! ... ALONG with FREDDIE and DAVID and CMA, and JAMES AUBREY!!!!! .... "Don't Get Me STARTED!!!")  Submitted by Scott Schechter


A: Only Scott Schechter would ask for, and expect, week-by-week ratings breakdown for the Garland series! We all love him, but frankly, we think he's out of control. At least he didn't ask for audience SHARE numbers as well as ratings, right? I think it's probably best to sum it up by saying that Judy indeed posted her best numbers on the premiere episode, and performed well (though not as well) the next week, which was the Streisand hour. The ratings then held steadily in the low twenties and thirties (then when there were 84 shows rated) until the end of November, and then the show dropped to 66th out of 80. As I wrote, Judy posted a 14.0 and Danny Kaye only a 17.0, but Danny was renewed and stayed on CBS for three seasons; he was a favorite of CBS president Aubrey, and to be frank, the show was far less problematic and less expensive to produce. The concert programs did much better in the ratings, rising to the low 30s (this sounds like a weather report!), but it was too late. Two things to remember: musical variety shows were on the decline by this point; comedy/variety shows were doing better. And Aubrey's sitcoms like "Beverly Hillbillies" were dominating the airwaves. And, CBS had 9 of 10 top shows on the air that season; the only thing marring that record was Judy not beating "Bonanza"; Aubrey saw Judy as being personally responsible for not making it a clean ratings sweep.

Q: Was Judy as pleased with her work on the series as she SHOULD have been? ... I'm with you, Steve : I think the series is the FINEST work of her career .... CERTAINLY her adult life, and CERTAINLY the FINEST RECORD we have of her as an ADULT PERFORMER ... of the CONCERT ARTIST!
Submitted by Scott Schechter

A: Was Judy as pleased with her work on the series as she "should have been" as you asked? Was Judy as pleased with any of her work as much as she "should have been"? The kids told me that she would watch the programs with them in the den of the Rockingham house; sometimes she would have lavish parties with Roger Edens, Mickey Rooney, Jayne Meadows and others during the airing. Other times, she would watch the shows alone with the kids and critique her performance as she watched, telling Liza, "Oh, I flubbed that line," or "Oh, I could have done that one better." Younger Lorna remembers Judy as being "very proud" of her work on the shows. Bill Colleran told me that Judy only really began to completely warm up to her own work, her own level of performance, when the concert format began. She took great pride in the format, championing CBS, having the ratings go up as a result. It was a very personal accomplisment, and vindication. She had listened to the so-called experts and they were wrong; her way was the right way. I don't think the concert format would have really worked for 26 weeks solid (particularly when there was no dialogue on some of the concerts), but her basic instict about putting the emphasis on music was certainly the correct one. 

But, of course, wouldn't the best way, the most logical way, was Norman Jewison's suggestion that, like Andy Williams, Perry Como and others, that Judy only do one a month, and rotate with other specials. That would have been perfect. Given her time to rest, rehearse, make it more of an event, and still a constant money source for her. A shame it was never considered, but that didn't seem to fit into CMA's blueprint.

Q1: Do you think, or feel, that we'll EVER get the ENTIRE SERIES released -- from the 2-Inch Video Masters -- not only on tape, but also on Laser Disc AND on the NEW and Improved DVD ?? (Digital Video Disc) (A Side - Related Question : WHY did the Christmas Show airing on NICK AT NIGHT last December, 1995 -- LOOK so GREAT, even better than the wonderful 1995 LaserLight Video release , and yet the Nick At Night airing was missing some of the "sweetening" : i.e: Added applause; an occasional NOTE that was flubbed by the orchestra, etc ... Do you think that the ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL TAPES that the shows were SHOT ONTO at CBS, STILL actually EXIST????!! I'd SWEAR that that's what this Christmas Show tape used on "Nick At Night" WAS ..... NOT a final "AIR" Tape, but the ACTUAL, ORIGINAL Videotape that was recorded at CBS .... Understand? .... Hope I wasn't being TOO TECHNICAL here for everyone .... What do you think about this, Steve?) 

Q2: Will the episodes ever be available to the public? I recorded the Judy, Liza, Barbra and Ethel off of Disney, but that's the only one I've ever seen.  Submitted by: Tracy

A1: For any of us who have seen the Garland series tape dubs taken from film transfers (however good) or from actual video masters, it is a completely different viewing experience. No wonder that we all wish to see, and have, these shows direct from the video source. I have recently been able to compare years of watching film transfer copies to now seeing these shows from video, and it is a 100% difference. Obviously, with tape, it makes it much more immediate and electrifying. Judy looks much better (better than from film images, which tends to make faces full of contrast and shadows). The sound is very different; it is alive and rich, compared with the flat sound of the film versions. 

There is an excellent chance that at least some of the lesser (or some of never at all) material will see the light of day soon. I just spoke to Sid Luft about this very recently. He has a major deal pending, but at this point it is only for 50 audio tracks; he is investigating deals which would allow for simultaneous video compilations. He even asked me last week if "there was a market" for releasing all 26 episodes as is. While I know that WE here would like that, from a pure marketing point of view, I honestly don't know whether that would work. Perhaps release the strongest shows in full one-hour form and then edit some of the lesser entries; in some of them, like the Basie and the Merman programs (not lesser entries, but uneven), Judy is virtually not seen for the first half, except for the opening number.

I suggested that perhaps one way to go in releasing all 26 shows (via TV, direct market or catalog, perhaps not retail) would be to charge a bit more for each tape, but put two episodes, and not just one, on the tape and put a lesser show with a strong one, say Barbra with Donald O'Connor; I'm not saying do that, but that's just my example. That way, the casual fan gets the prized one (Barbra) and the collector gets both. So, that's a possibility.

Without going into great detail here, it should be noted that Sid only came into having the original video masters for all the shows only three years ago. Until then, he had (superior) film transfers of about 13 and 13 video-to-video copies,but they were from CBS and the Canadian Broadcasting Company, not from the original 2" masters. Now that he has the originals, they make for better duplicating and audio tracks. Plus, these tapes also have outtakes, alternate takes and the like. Which opens up a whole new door of possibilities.

A2: This may cover ground we've already discussed, but Sid Luft does now finally have the video masters to all 26 episodes. That means, the air versions (with sweetened appaluse, edits, etc.) plus the "raw" material, which includes outtakes, alternate performances, clapperboards, stops and starts (like the false start for "Be My Guest" from Streisand, the "Tea" with Steve Allen, the freeze-frame opening of show #17's "They Can't Take That Away From Me" where the girl dancers are replaced by the boy dancers in tuxes; on the tape, for example, she holds her pose while the dancers change from girl to boy; also on that same show, "By Myself" gets a prolonged standing ovation, not seen on the final air version.) Also, that means Sid has the unaired material from show #26 as well. 

To answer the other part of your question, these are indeed the actual "CBS" tapes and Sid has all the material. Now that all shows exist on video, there is an entirely new market for them, since they are so far superior to the film transfers; they also lend themselves much better to colorization, if Sid decides to take that route.

Q: You write in your book that the audio of Battle Hymn from the dress rehearsal was grafted onto the second take; but when I've watched it, the audio/visual seem to match perfectly. Are they really from different takes?  Submitted by: Michael

A: Yes. Until I heard the original audio track where Judy's mike did short out, I wasn't exactly sure where it happened myself! It begins with "....he hath sounded forth..." and continues using the dress rehearsal audio until the "...his truth is marching on..." end of that verse. (During that same verse, Judy briefly stumbled over the lyric and sang "...Be my feet/my jup-ithee..."; John Fricke tells of the story that when Judy sang "Battle Hymn" during the 1967 Felt Forum engagement, the audience sang with her and the entire room sang "...be my feet/my jup-ithee..." based on three years of listening to the track on the 1964 "Just For Openers" album culled from the series!)
Q: Of the many nemeses that populated the executive offices of CBS during the run of "The Judy Garland Show", Hunt Stromberg, Jr. seemed to be the most malevolent. Was there a reason for his animosity? Did he have a personal axe to grind? What is he doing now and where can I find him so I can punch his lights out! Just kidding -- sort of.  Submitted by: Gary

A: Gary Smith from Kingsrow asking a question about the Garland show; I always KNEW he'd come around in time! Actually, when I ran into the "other" Gary Smith not long after the book came out, he was angry with me, saying that I wrote that he was responsible for the demise of the series. I had to explain to him that I wrote what Judy THOUGHT about him in terms of him not supporting the concert format; I also took pains to note his efforts to make the show work, including a quote from Jewison saying without Gary, the show wouldn't have lasted as long as it did. He seemed to accept that explanation. 

As far as Hunt Stromberg, Jr. is concerned, by all accounts, he was a very odd person. His father, of course, was a noted Hollywood producer; Judy and Sid's West Los Angeles Mapleton Drive home had, in fact, been owned by Hunt Stromberg, Sr. Hunt was universally despised by most everyone he knew; Aubrey was the only person who liked him and they seemed to forge a rather unholy bond. When Aubrey was fired in 1965, Stromberg was immediately fired as well; neither fared well after. He was a complex man, indeed; one would think that he would have appreciated Judy because of his family background. But there was also CBS infighting; Judy was caught in the middle of a power play between Hubbell Robinson and Hunt Stromberg; Hubbell was Judy's champion and was involved in the Ford Star Jubilee deal (he was also an ex-husband of Judy's friend, Margaret Whiting); Robinson and Stromberg battled for position at CBS, and with Stromberg allied with CBS president Aubrey, Stromberg prevailed. And Stromberg apparently resented the fact that Robinson made the Garland deal and brought her to CBS for the weekly series; since it was not his "baby" he seemed to want to destroy it and prove that Robinson had made a "mistake" in signing Garland. Judy was caught in the cross-fire.

Q: I would first like to thank you for taking the time to research and write the book, Rainbow's End. I hope that you realize the debt of gratitude Garland fans and historians of the entertaiment industry owe you. 

I have two questions. Firstly, do you know where one may obtain commercially the outakes to the series that you document in your book. Secondly, have you considered producing a laser disc version of the television series with taped interviews of the show's guests and participants. The life of video tape and the participants to this series will not last forever. Would Sid Luft cooperate on this venture? 

Though I am a rather busy lawyer in Vancouver, Canada, I would be pleased to assist you or others in this venture, if feasible. I was born a month before the first Garland show was taped. Thank you for bringing her to life for me.   Submitted by: Grant:

A: First of all, thanks for the kind words about the book. The book, as it says inside, was written "for Judy" -- and to me, in a way, that includes everyone who continues to be touched by her talent and humanity as a person and performer. 

As far as your question about obtaining outtakes of the series, except for some pirated copies of certain moments floating around, nothing can be obtained commercially at this point. This is certainly prized material and while I've seen some of it, I have precious little of this stuff myself. Safe to say that this material is locked away in vaults with the key held tightly by Sid Luft. 

Sid holding tight control of this material also is true of actual air versions of the shows as well; from what I can gather, Sid has two versions of each episode; as aired, and then the "raw" material comprised of performances, and -- sometimes --outtakes, flubs, clapperboards and false starts, etc. It's great stuff, to be sure. 

And then, of course, there is the mountain of unaired material from show #26. At one point, there was talk about Turner releasing a laser set of material just from #26, including "Here's to Us" and the takes from "Where is the Clown?" (itself about an hour). I was to write the notes and John Fricke would have been strongly involved as well. However, Sid's negotiations with Turner (to release a considerable amount of series material overall) stalled and that project was also dropped. Sid, however, may have now another, if less ambitious deal pending. Of course, most of the actual aired material hasn't been seen generally, so there's all of that material which would likely be released (if at all) before any alternate stuff. I would think the obvious plan would be to release certain shows as aired first; who knows if they would ever even get to unaired material. That might take the work of a producer "in the know," someone like Andrew Solt who did the "Sullivan" compilation specials. Or someone who would attempt to tackle a big-budget full-scale TV/film documentary on her life.

Funny you should mention a video version of my book. For years, I've always wanted to do a "Rainbow's End" documentary using new and existing interviews, along other materials and performance footage and outtakes. And with many people no longer with us since writing the book, it seems time is of the essence here. But nothing has ever come of it; finding a venue, finding the money to produce it and the clearance payments required by the various unions make this a daunting proposition. 

However, if you can arrange financing and want to back this project, let me know and I'll immediately arrange a meeting for us with Sid! I'm sure he'd be very interested, but remember Sid would undoubtedly want substantial financial and likely creative participation, as he is sole owner of this material.) 

You being an attorney might be very helpful in putting this together; if nothing else, I'm sure Sid could use you now, or sometime soon, to sue somebody!

Q: I'm in the process of creating a documentary about Judy and I'm wondering if this is something you've considered doing (based on your own book). If you have given any thought to doing this type of project I would be interested in collaborating with you. I would be available for editing and research. If you're not currently involved with this type of project I would greatly appreciate any information you can give me regarding copyright regulations. This documentary is focused on her television image. Thank you for your time! Submitted by:  Frank

A: I won't go into too much detail in terms of an answer, because I believe I've covered the ownership question of the Garland TV material in earlier questions. But, again, Sid Luft owns all 26 shows, the 1962 and 1963 specials; additionally, he says he holds the copyright on the 1955 Ford Star Jubilee and 1956 special as well. While I would love to do a documentary utilizing this material, Sid Luft is currently holding all of this material for his own use and is presently uninterested in working with any outside companies or individuals on such a project, primarily due to the fact that such a documentary might be part of an overall deal he is presently negotiating with at least one large "megaplayer," as they say in Hollywood. 

Conversely, anyone attempting to try to create or produce such a program without Sid Luft's permission will be promptly faced by legal action, I can assure you!

But we can only hope that out of his deal, a great full-scale documentary might sooner than later materialize.

Was Judy Garland a nice lady?  Submitted by:  Steve

A: I didn't know her, but over 20 years, I've known or interviewed probably two hundred people who did, ranging from one-time encounters to friendships with her children and husbands.  Still, I don't feel entirely comfortable attempting to answer the question in suggesting any firsthand experience.  I can say that, based on what I've been told or gathered from the people I've known who knew her well (or not well), and whatever high or low point in her life they knew her (and either long or short-term) or however close or brief the association, I always came away with the vivid impression that knowing her was one of the most important, if not THE most important, relationship of their lives.  It's an overused phrase, but she truly was a force of nature; and even if she was at her lowest, ill, influenced by medication, her essence was that of a profoundly compassionate, intelligent, caring human being who wanted to do her best and do her best for those closest to her as well as to her audience.  In terms of those people I knew from repeated interviews about her tv series, she remains the most profound professional experience of their lives -- and their personal affection, their love, remains strong and unshaken by the passing years or by the demands she might put upon them at times -- primarily based on insecurity, trusting the wrong people, bad advice, loneliness and wanting to please.  All in all, perhaps it's best to sum up by saying what George Schlatter told me, "She took a lot from you -- but she gave a lot more than she took."  I can also say that when I wrote a book on Lucille Ball ("Desilu"), I came away profoundly disappointed at the woman I uncovered -- difficult, angry, bitter, controlling and distant from her children, husband and co-workers; on the other hand, when I concluded my book on Judy, I came away with only more respect, gratitude,  appreciation and sense of her awareness, compassion, caring and deep commitment to her work at to those close to her.  No matter what new information may come may way, Judy, the human being, has never disappointed me; instead, her courage, humor, intelligence and determination to go on -- despite addiction, personal and professional betrayal, the loss of health, voice and professional stature -- only affirms my admiration and respect for an extraordinary human being, talent and friend to those who truly had her best interests at heart.  I hope it doesn't betray a confidence to say that Sid Luft still deeply loves Judy and is still in love with the woman he met and married.  As he has oft said, "She was, and is, the most extraordinary woman that God ever created."

Steve Sanders

Please direct corrections, technical inquiries and new submissions to the webmaster
See copyright statement
Judy Garland -The Live Performances! original artwork ©1995-2002 Steve Jarrett.